In discussing what first city studied Slavic artifact and philology, scholars of Eastern European History, Renaissance Italy, Medieval Europe, Russia, Medieval Japan, and the early Middle East discussed the meaning of the artifacts and objects from these various cities, which in turn, provided information about their cultures and societies. One could say that the artifacts provided the first knowledge of what the citizens of these first civilizations, in a given society, viewed as sacred. Through archaeology and anthropology one could trace the cultural development of various peoples through time, through artifacts.
What became clear is that the meaning of what first city studied was an important one, especially in terms of its effects on the meaning of religious art in various Eastern Orthodox religions. For instance, the artifacts from Khotyn, in which many figurines of the Virgin Mary and angels were found, had a vast Christian influence on Russian Culture and on Russian Education and upbringing. When scholars discussed what first city studied the slavic artifact and philology of ancient Russia, they also had to take into consideration what the artifacts meant in light of what the Russian People’s Intellectuals, Fathers, and Orthodox Church claimed as true.
The meaning of the artifacts provided scholars with insights into the thinking of the ancient Russian peoples and the development of their religion and culture. Many of the most creative, profound, and popular works of art in the Russian Diaspora, including such famous ones as the Mother of All Parishes, the Golden Ring Ceremony Site, and the Unastern regions of the city of Smolensk, show great parallels to the works of ancient artists of the Near East, and the Russian People’s Philology of History provides some interesting connections to religious practices in their Diaspora. In both cases scholars noted how similar the symbols, and beliefs were. This led scholars to assert that there is a commonality of origin for these ancient religions, that they share a heritage of thought and heritage.
However, in order to reach this conclusion about what the first ancient city to write down its Slavic texts was not enough. In order to explain why certain symbols, images, and beliefs ring true to Russian beliefs and history scholars also needed to study the other cultures of the area as well. For example, in the Urals there are numerous similarities between Uralic and Caucasian Mythological traditions. Similarly, in Central Asia there are many similarities between Asian and Southeastern Mythology.
Therefore, when scholars suggest that the first city to write down its Slavic documents was in the Caspian Sea there is no proof that such a place existed. Archaeologists have discovered many sites in the Caspian Sea, which are older than twenty thousand years, but scholars debate whether these sites were real. There are only certain artifacts, including artifacts of fine craftsmanship, which can be dated back to this era. In fact, when one compares the artifacts found in many areas in the world with those from the Caspian area, it is obvious that there is a stylistic difference, not to mention geographical differences. It is possible that the Caspian Sea area did, in fact, produce the first city to record its own ancient texts.
The first document found in the Caspian area was a codex, which recorded the ancient laws and traditions of the people who lived in the area at that time. Many of the legal aspects of these ancient societies are still practiced today, although changes have been made to ensure compliance. The first language that the people used may not have been the modern Russian language, but the same ideas and concepts were recorded.
The second ancient document that was found was the so-called Khitai. This refers to an ancient Hindu text that discusses the concepts and beliefs of the people of that time. Although the terminology used in the Khitai is sometimes difficult to understand, it provides valuable insight into the ancient Hindu society of that era. This same language, along with the phonetic pronunciations of the consonants, indicates that the authors of the Khitai were native speakers of both Hindu and Slavic languages. Thus, the document does provide some evidence that the original Indo-European cultures spoke in tongues other than Sanskrit.
It should be noted that both these ancient documents do not provide concrete information about the origins of the Hindu religion. However, they do provide some intriguing archaeological information that helps us understand the concepts and beliefs of this ancient culture. In addition, they also shed light on the way in which this ancient civilization recorded its sacred texts. Their writing systems were unlike anything previously known. It is possible that the written texts found in Europe and the United States could have originated from this early civilization.
The information is given by Los Filo Logos Website. Thank you for reading!