What is Philology? Well, it is the study of ancient or classic works written by authors from different countries about their historical and cultural context. The word came from the Greek word meaning “language”. It refers to a field that studies word meanings across many generations and periods.
It has been said that the Bible is the most philolitic book ever written. Even scholars who disagree with this claim have found enough evidence to show that it indeed contains embedded meanings that can be deduced from the various literary and archaeological artifacts available. This is also evident in its usage in the Bible, where there are times when words are used that obviously refer to events and characters from the ancient world and history. These instances, scholars believe, provide strong evidence for the ideas expressed in the Bible.
Modern philology finds support in other areas of human history and cultural development as well. philology on the other hand, studies of word meanings across time, sometimes even cultures, in order to prove that certain words have meanings that can be applied to other fields and cultures outside of Bible scholarship. For example, the English word “conscience” can mean a lot of things. One can find the meaning in its contexts in ancient epics and literature, but in modern use, it usually means “mind”, “spirit” and “intuition”.
In addition, several Bible scholars (e.g., Meyer King etc.) disagree with the view that all words in the Bible are word meanings that can be deduced from their etymology and other related considerations. They maintain that, in the first instance, there are no word meanings that can be used to prove the claims made in the Bible. So, it is mere philology that provides support for the claims made in the Bible.
A major drawback of philology (and of language study in general) is that it is a descriptive approach. What one sees as right is usually right according to the reader’s point of view-however, it could also be right according to someone else’s point of view. This is why I prefer a prescriptive approach to any task in life-I prefer to know what is right from the beginning rather than being led around by others who think differently.
The other problem that arises from philology is that there are too many interpretive methods used to describe the Bible. Some of these interpretive methods are more correct than others when dealing with word meanings. For example, some people believe that the Bible has a completely unique word meanings; this is contrary to the belief of the majority of people who believe the Bible is very similar to other ancient written texts. The word translated literally in the English Bible into “man” and “woman” is incorrect because it does not have any grammatical structure that could make it easy to translate word meanings in this manner. As a result, the Bible cannot be easily and simply Interpreted by humans; they must be handled and interpreted by people with training in philology.
A third problem is that not all people are trained to interpret ancient written texts. Many Christians and Muslims do not see the need to have their Bible Interpreted, thus leaving the job to Bible Scholars. Fortunately, there are scholars who have spent years studying such Bible texts who can interpret them very easily and clearly for Christians and Muslims alike. However, there are scholars who have spent hundreds of years studying such ancient documents that, as a result of their extensive studies, can hardly be expected to be open to interpretations by non-academics. It is because of this that I personally prefer to use philology as a teaching tool over interpretive methods whenever possible. This way, I am not limited to only what other scholars say about a certain topic.
Lastly, I want to point out that there is a difference between a literal and figurative translation. Sometimes, literal translations can sound very boring and tedious to people who are used to more modern and less literary styles. On the other hand, a good translation should at least read as if the people using it actually understood the original text, as if they were conversing with an ancient oracle. When this is done well, it makes a very strong case for philology and its value as a learning tool.
The information is provided by Los Filo Logos. Thank you for following!